One True Church - Protestants Poo Poo Pompous Pope

Unknown to the world at large is the fact that millionsevery man will in the end be his word and his word
of bible taught Christians care little about ecumenicalalone. (John 12:48)
dialogue with Catholicism. Because they believe in theThe Catholic hierarchy not only agreed to put the
promised "apostasy" of the church in the laststatements of the Pope on the same level as the
generation of time they will do anything to stay clearwords of Christ but they managed to keep God's
of all the best efforts of ecumenicists to pull them intoword even from the clergy themselves. The few
ecumenicism, syncretism, liberalism or anything else thebibles that were available were chained down in the
papacy has to offer.Catholic Cathedrals and could not be removed for
In the present climate of political correctness thestudy until the seventeenth century.
responses from protestant ministers and othersAlthough the Bible is no longer chained Catholics have
seems cautious, apologetic and perhaps even a bitbeen well conditioned not to seek it out for themselves
squeamish. Even the Catholic clergy has prefacedright up to the present day. In a July 2007 Barna
many of their assessments of the Popes statementsReport that surveyed 4000 Catholics it was
with what seems like disclaimers.discovered that they are 38% less likely to read their
Fox News published an explanation by FatherBibles as Protestants. The report did not ask the
Jonathan Morris, July 11, 2007. Morris said he received aquestion of whether they would trust what they read
barrage of e-mails after the Pope made his statementbut even a cursory examination of most Catholics
and felt compelled to address the concerns of thewould prove that belief in biblical authority is almost non
inquirers. Just in case Protestants may have thoughtexistent among them.
the Pope just condemned them all to hell, Morris said,When the Bible was translated and published for "the
"...Pope Benedict does not believe, and has nevercommon man" into English by reformer Martin Tyndale,
suggested, non-Catholics are all going to hell becausehis reward was to be burned at the stake by the
they are not members of the Catholic Church."Catholic Church. Martin Luther's life was threatened for
Morris takes his concerns a step further and says,drawing attention to the Bible but other reformers
"Speaking of salvation, from the sight of things as I seewere not so lucky and the list of those who were
it, it is quite possible that many present daymartyred by the papacy is a matter of historical
non-Catholic Christians who are fervent believers in,record.
and practitioners of, the teachings of Jesus will get toThe sale of indulgences by the Catholic Church was
heaven before the throngs of wishy-washy, nominalonly the beginning of the reformation. It was seen by
Catholics who only show up to the church doors forLuther and others that this notion was not just unbiblical
infant baptism, the taking of marriage vows, and theirbut was a form of mind control based on the fear of
own funeral. Of course, I don't know who will be on thehell. No protestant preaching of "hell fire and brimstone"
other side of the pearly gates, but I believe, with theproduced as much fear as the Catholic idea of both
Pope, that there is more to the challenge of personallimbo and purgatory, both which are also not biblical. As
justification and salvation than calling oneself a Catholicthe reformation theologians progressed into the latter
- or a Christian, for that matter."part of the sixteenth century they discovered that not
Following the Pope's remarks Dr. Gerald Kieschnickmuch of what Catholics were being taught was even
president of The Lutheran Church of the Missouriremotely biblical.
Synod said, that it was this kind of thinking in theBoth then and now it is believed by many Catholics
Catholic papacy that precipitated the very 16th centurythat the additional teachings added to scriptures by
reformation that produced reformers like Luther andpatristic additions, ex-cathedra or papal encyclicals is
Calvin. Dr. Kieschnick said "At that time, Martin Luthersupplemental to the Bible and thus would only be very
said 'Popes and councils can err.' Kieschnick said thathelpful. A careful look at these teachings is enough to
this is still true today.see that they do more to supplant the Bible truths than
Weighing in on the controversy R. Albert Mohler Jr., theto supplement them.
president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary inIn most cases the Catholic dogma is diametrically
Louisville Kentucky made repeated reference to theopposed to the scriptural teaching as in Mariology,
fact that he was not offended. In remarks made in anobservances of sacraments, repetitive prayers,
article to the Baptist Press July 13, 2007, Mohler wasoffering repeated sacrifice in masses, the priesthood,
not reticent to point out that while he appreciated thecelibacy, canonization of saints, prayers to saints and
Pope's concern he was sure the Pope was "not rightthe list goes on. The worst aberration of God's word is
on the papacy, not right on the sacraments, not rightthe dangerous and conflicting teaching of penance.
on the priesthood, not right on the Gospel, not right onPenance not only is unbiblical but it makes God appear
the church." Like many other Protestant leaders Mohleras a complete dunce who can be bought off by
seemed guided by maturity and Christian love in hisrepeated confessions and mumbling of prayers instead
response but would make no concession for theof repenting. Good hearted Catholics know that this
Pope's arrogance or error.doesn't cover them but the numbers of those who
The Washington Post had little new to say about thenever realize this is frightening to imagine. Those souls
release of the document but the New York Sun said inhave surely been victimized by the very religion they
an article by Daniel Johnson, July 11, 2007, "Some criticsthought was delivering them as they skip along sinning
see this new document as part of a 'traditionalist'through life between visits to the confessional.
counterrevolution that includes the ending of restrictionsSadly it is not just the Bible that Catholics have had
on the use of the old Tridentine Mass, which they claimkept from them but it is their own dark history that
signals a reversion to old-style Catholic anti-Judaism."remains unspoken. As the reformation progressed
Responses from notable televangelist's like PatCatholic inquisitors tortured and murdered tens of
Robertson, John Hagee or Rod Parsley seem all toothousand of men and women for the slightest descent
conspicuously missing from the media. One lengthy butfrom papal dogma.
superb article on the subject of the Pope's documentThe uninspired and totally unbiblical foundation for the
is found on The Christian Worldview Network website.Crusades was born of the papacy but the blame is
Ministries Doctor and writer Dennis Wright offers aplaced on all Christendom by the secular world. This is
balanced, fair and informative article entitled "Whatsomething Protestants neither earned nor deserve.
We've Got Here is a Failure to Communicate!" postedNo Catholic catechism class or message from Catholic
on July 13, 2007. Wright holds no punches and remindspulpits ever contains reference to the hundreds of
Christians that it is the Pope's authority that was firstthousands of Protestants that were brutally hunted
questioned during the reformation and the samedown and murdered by papal armies. Albigensis,
questions remain to this day.Waldensis and others were slaughtered until nearly a
Dr. Wright reminds believers of something that ishalf million of them had been martyred. In one night
taught in most conservative or mainstreampapal armies pulled 100,000 French Huguenots out of
Pentecostal, Evangelical and fundamentalist churchestheir homes and killed them.
throughout America and other countries around theCatholic history is never taught correctly to the laity
globe. He says, "Part of the problem stems from whatwhich is reflected in the fact that the average Catholic
Jesus said to Simon Peter in Matthew 16: "And I tellhas no idea when their church began. It was not till the
you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build myedict given by Emperor Constantine to make
church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. IChristianity the state religion that Catholicism began.
will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven;That edict was more than 300 years after Christ's
whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven,resurrection. For over three hundred years the
and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed inbelievers were meeting in homes and buildings with
heaven."only the scripture as their guide exactly as Protestants
Every Greek scholar understands that "Peter" is thedo today.
Greek word "petros" (which means "a little rock") andIt is impossible to escape the parallels between the
that Jesus used a different word for the "rock" uponancient Judaic system of worship and modern
which he would build his church. This is "petra" (whichCatholicism. God gave his laws and commands to
means "a massive strata of rock"). DistinguishedMoses who handed them down to the Israelites. The
Greek scholar A.T. Roberston says: "On this rock [epientirety of those laws is contained largely in only two
tautei tei petrai] Jesus says a ledge or cliff of rock likebooks of the first five books of the Bible. The Jewish
that in 7:24 on which the wise man built his house.priesthood added oral traditions to those first laws that
[Petros] is usually a smaller detachment of thefill dozens of books.
massive ledge."By the time Christ came to earth he had to spend a
Thus, Jesus is not saying that He will build His churchlarge portion of time rebuking, refuting and rejecting the
upon Peter, but upon Himself! Ephesians 2:20 says thathuge and lumbering weight of the uninspired and man
the church is "built on the foundation of the apostlesmade traditions of the priesthood. He wasn't as gentle
and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chiefwith the priesthood as PC guided Protestants are with
cornerstone." It should also be pointed out that PeterPope Benedict XVI today. He called them a generation
never claimed supremacy for himself."of snakes and a bunch of hypocrites. Jesus would
Not mentioned by Dr. Wright is the fact that Peter wassurely be censored by today's standards. It seems
never even the leader of the first church in Jerusalemreasonable to assume that he would be just as upset
but it was pastored by James the half brother ofby what we have added to the beauty and simplicity
Jesus. Thirty or more years after his ministry beganof his gospel, not to mention the twists, perversions
Peter had to be rebuked by the apostle Paul for hisand foolish interpretations that we have attached to it
refusal to keep company with Gentiles. Not only is thisin this day.
not the record of a great leader but no where doesYet for all this it does not mean that Catholics are not
the bible itself recognize a papacy, a first pope or thesaved or heaven bound. Fortunately Christ has placed
call for the succession of popes. This non biblicalonly one prerequisite on us all for entrance into heaven.
doctrine has never disturbed Catholic theologiansIt is the same for Catholics or Protestants. Jesus said
because by putting the Pope on an equal par with"All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and
Christ as his Vicar or "earthly representative" thehim that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out." (John
Popes can declare anything they want to and it6:37) This speaks not to the universality of Catholicism
becomes cannon, "the word of God."but to the universality of Christ's salvation. It also
It is this pompous and flawed presumption thatreminds us of the oft quoted phrase "God saves us
produced dozens of other non-biblical doctrines andnot because of our religion, but in spite of it."
dogma. It is also what led to the reformation.A far more important question than "which is the true
Men like Luther, Calvin, Tyndale, Zwingli and manychurch" is "which is the true salvation." Peter was the
others should never have been labeled "Protestants."first to say that it was not his own name that provides
They were not protesting they were calling for asalvation but it is the name of Jesus only. To wit;
return to the original message of the Bible and"Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none
complete recognition of Christ's supreme authority inother name under heaven given among men, whereby
his spoken word. Christ and the apostles gave sternwe must be saved." (Acts 4:12) The name is not
warning to anyone who would add to or pervert hisBaptist, or Catholic or Evangelical or Pentecostal, the
words. In Fact Christ said the basis of judgment forname is Jesus.