A Guide to Election Night for the Non-Political Junkie

Even if you are not a political junkie like I am, you willpolls (or political polls in general) will offer two main
still probably find yourself glued to your TV set oncriticisms of them. The first is: "They've never asked
election night. Obviously, you'll be waiting to find outme." In actuality, very few voters are ever contacted
whether President George W. Bush will be elected orby pollsters. Only a very small sample of voters is
if Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts willneeded to get a reasonably accurate result, provided it
become our 44th President. Will everything you seeis random enough and varied enough among all
and hear that night be interesting? Will it even makedemographic groups, geographic areas, etc. To use an
sense to you? Well, if all you are interested in is findinganalogy that I've often heard, you don't need to drink
out who wins, you may be in for a long and boringthe whole glass of tea to find out whether or not it's
night. Volumes of information will be presented thatsweet. Just a taste will due, assuming the glass has
night before a final winner is declared. However, if youbeen stirred properly. The other criticism is: "They ask
know a few things to look for, all of that stuff mightintentionally misleading and confusing questions." This is
make a lot more sense and actually be interesting asquite true of many political polls. However, the main
well.question asked during exit poling is: "For whom did you
For one thing, you need to be aware that there's onlyvote?". I wonder which part of that question people
going to be a passive emphasis on the national popularwouldn't understand.
vote, i.e., the total amount of votes cast nationally forAs states are called, their electoral votes are placed
each candidate. That's because it doesn't determineinto one candidate's column. Also, look for each news
who wins - the electoral votes do. In every stateorganization to utilize a map of the United States,
except Maine, Nebraska, and perhaps Colorado (morewhich starts out with each state depicted as white. As
on that later), the winner of that state receives all of itsa state is called for Bush, its color is changed to red; as
electoral votes. Maine awards them by congressionala state is called for Kerry, its color is changed to blue;
district, with the other two going to that state's overallhence, the red states and blue states. Look for
winner. Nebraska awards its electoral votesKentucky to be the first state called. That state closes
proportionally, based on the percentage of the popularits polls at 6:00 Eastern Time and will almost certainly
vote each candidate receives in that state.fall into Bush's column. Once a candidate reaches 270
The number of electoral votes each state has isor more electoral votes, he will be declared the winner
calculated by adding the number of its congressionalof the election, regardless of the total popular votes or
districts to the number of its senators. The number ofhow many red or blue states he has earned.
congressional districts each state has is based on itsIf Bush wins all the states he won in 2000 and no
population. The more populous states like California andmore, he will win by a larger margin (277-261) in the
Texas have a lot more congressional districts thanelectoral college than he won by last time (271-267).
more sparsely populated states like Wyoming orActually, he could lose one of his smaller states like
Vermont. However, every state has at least oneNew Hampshire, without picking up one that Gore won,
congressional district, no matter how small itsand still win the election. This is because, based on the
population. Every state has exactly two senators.2000 census, the population has shifted a bit and six
Therefore, every state has at least three electoralcongressional seats (and therefore the same amount
votes. In addition to all the states, the District ofof electoral votes) have shifted from "Gore" states to
Columbia is allotted three electoral votes, even though"Bush" states.
it has no voting members in Congress.The key states to watch throughout the evening will
Many people believe the electoral college, the systembe the so-called "battleground" states. The candidate
of casting electoral votes to determine the outcome ofwho wins the majority of those states will likely win the
the presidential election, is inherently unfair and shouldelection. By most estimates, these states include New
be abolished in favor of a system in which the winnerHampshire, Pennsylvania, Florida, West Virginia, Ohio,
is determined purely by the national popular vote. OfIowa, Wisconsin, Colorado, and New Mexico. Most of
course, it would take a Constitutional amendment forthe other states are considered to already be in the
that to happen. Therefore, the electoral college is herecolumn of one candidate or the other. As a general
to stay. Even if such amendment could get therule, Bush is expected to be strong in the south,
required two-thirds margin in the House and Senate, itsouthwest, and mountain and prairie west. Kerry looks
would never be able to get the required three-quartersto be strong in the northeast, upper Midwest, and along
of the state legislatures. There are too many smallthe Pacific coast. I don't see any state further west
states that would be staunchly opposed to it, as theythan New Mexico or Colorado being a major decisive
feel that the electoral college allows them to befactor. It is already assumed that California, Oregon,
"players" in the presidential election campaign that theyWashington, and Hawaii will all go for Kerry, while
would not be in a purely popular vote system. TheseAlaska will go for Bush.
small states fear that they would be completelyColorado could prove to be the most controversial this
ignored by presidential candidates, without the electoraltime, but only if everything falls right. There is an
college. I fear that they are right.initiative on the Colorado ballot to award its electoral
Many states will be "called", i.e., a projected winner ofvotes proportionally, instead of awarding all nine of
that state will be announced, by news organizations asthem to the winner, as it does now. If passed, this
soon as the polls close in those states. This can bewould go into effect immediately with this election.
done fairly accurately with the use of exit polls, aSince the race in Colorado is expected to be close,
process by which voters are asked about theirthe results of this measure would effectively take four
decision as they are exiting their polling places. If theelectoral votes away from the winner of the state and
exit polling sample alone from a given state shows agive them to the loser. Therefore, if the measure
clear victory for one candidate, they will call that statepasses and the candidate who wins Colorado loses
as soon as its polls close. If the exit polls show that athe election by less than nine electoral votes, the
given state is too close to call, they will wait untilmeasure will have cost that candidate the election.
enough of the actual vote count comes in beforeObviously, a major legal battle would ensue if that
calling that state. Exit polls are sometimes wrong,happened.
though. The most infamous example was Florida inOne final item to watch for on election night is the
2000, when it was called for Gore based on exit pollingbattle for control of the House and the Senate. The
data and some of the actual results. After more of theRepublicans currently hold a slim margin in both houses.
actual results started coming in, however, the newsSeveral key wins, or "pick-ups," by the Democrats
organizations soon started to realize things might notcould turn things around in their favor in one house or
go in Florida the way they had projected, so they soonpossibly both. Conversely, some pick-ups by the
retracted their call and the state ultimately went toRepublicans could increase their margin in one or both
Bush.house. Key races that could go either way will be
By the way, people who say they never believe exitmonitored closely throughout the evening.