Computer Training - Does the Training Cost Justify the Results?

Why is it that month after month, year after year,is, no one likes to listen to a monotone or a boring
despite dozens of soft-skills and computer trainingpresentation; your instructor needs to be dynamic,
courses, employees don't seem competent on theinteresting, engaging, and succinct, or again, your dollars
job? If this describes you or your company, you areand sense ratio will fall.
not alone. In the 16 years I have been training, I have4. Lack of Lab Time During Training Sessions
heard this complaint many times (usually from theThe very word "lab," when discussed in conjunction
students themselves!), the result being employees whowith computer training, sounds so flabby, boring, and
are not able to handle core competencies on the jobunproductive. It's hard to imagine a more boring
despite training investments of time and money.scenario: a bunch of people quietly muddling through an
While I normally like to provide statistics in my articles,exercise or two while the instructor just "lounges."
truth to tell, I had trouble finding any statistics on thisWhat a waste of training dollars and time! Right?
subject--searches turned up companies offeringWrong!
training, but not articles on the subject of trainingIt is not possible for an instructor to actually teach a
efficiency. It seems many are eager to provide thestudent anything. The best the instructor can do is
training, but few are willing to back up their results.present the material as clearly, and engagingly, as
Despite this glaring deficiency, we can still glean somepossible, and the student must assimilate the
valuable concepts from a thoughtful look at the topic.information and teach themselves.
So let's take a look at 6 things that go wrong withWhat? Don't believe me? When was the last time you
training, why, and how to fix them so you can begin tosuccessfully taught a stone to operate a computer? I
obtain the results you are paying for.guarantee you, no matter how dynamic, interesting,
1. Training Not Job-Specificfactual, concise, and efficient an instructor you find, you
The number one reason employees are not able towill not be able to teach a stone to do anything (well,
translate their training into tangible business results isother than fall, which they already do exceedingly well!).
that the training is not job-specific. Think back to whenPoint is, no matter how good the presentation, the
you were a kid in school, learning math skills that youemployees have to process the data, understand it,
could never in a million years imagine needing. This isand make it theirs, and the only time this really begins
exactly how your employees feel in training coursesto occur is while they are trying to use the program
that are not designed specifically for their job tasks.without help.
While it may be pedagogically correct to teachThink of a lab like training wheels on a bicycle. It's a
employees all 93 ways to navigate a program, and towhole lot easier to learn to ride a bike when you try it
systematically cover each area of computer softwareout on your own, with a little help from the training
or soft-skills competencies, they do not work well forwheels when you need it, than starting right in on trying
translating training into results. Why? The simpleto ride a two-wheeler all alone!
answer is: boredom and job-skills density.Yet this is exactly what many training sessions are like,
Employees do not have the attention span to wadeand why they are not effective. Imagine simply telling a
through several hours of concepts to finally get to thechild, "start pedaling, keep the handlebars pointed
1 or 2 actually useful ideas from the training session.straight ahead, and pull this lever to stop." That's the
That is why the number one thing you can do toupshot of so many training sessions. This is why labs
increase your "dollars and sense ratio" is to tailor theare extremely important to the overall success of a
training courses to your employees' job tasks.training session.
I realize this is easier said than done. Because, forNow, let me be clear.
starters, it purposefully leaves large holes in theI am not suggesting that the whole class suddenly grind
employees' knowledge sets relating to a softwareto a halt in the middle of a training session, and take
application or soft-skill. But times have changed. Used30-45 minutes to do a lab on a single concept. Labs
to be, you could learn all there was to know about acan be smoothly, subtly, integrated into a training
software program in a few weeks, and even becomesession, as easily as offering 4-5 minutes here and
fairly proficient at virtually everything in a few days.there for students to try out a concept on their own,
Now, it is simply not feasible for employees to mastertake notes, or replicate a previous exercise.
every aspect of a program.For your next training session, insist on labs throughout,
Think about it. A company like Microsoft has spentto reinforce and solidify key concepts.
millions and millions of dollars developing a program like6. Overly-Long Training Sessions
Word. This has also taken hundreds--possiblyEveryone wants to get the most bang for the buck,
thousands--of people, from designers to programmersso scheduling the longest possible training sessions for
to marketers, almost two decades of growing thethe money seems to make the most sense. The
program in every conceivable way. Should we reallylonger students are in the classroom, the more they'll
expect an employee to master a program like this in alearn, right? Well, yes--to a point.
day or two? Does it make any sense at all?Think back to the last super long movie you watched.
Think of software as a language. Each program is itsThink, "The Green Mile" or even "Gone with the Wind."
own language, although thanks to common operatingThese are seminal, classic works, and anyone
systems such as Mac and Windows, and sharedwatching them wants to be there, right? Yet how
standards, there are some common words. Becausemany of you have rented a long movie and broken it
of the overwhelming complexity of a language, itup over at least a couple of nights? (Come on now, be
makes more and more sense to learn the specifics ofhonest!)
what you need to accomplish, rather than to learnIf you're like most people, even with material you
endless trivia and details that ultimately will not matteractively are enjoying, there is a limit to how much you
and, worse, dilute the whole experience to the point ofwant and are able to absorb at once, and this is
uselessness.especially true in your corporate training sessions.
Let me put it this way.Having taught many a course that lasted 7-8 hours, I
Imagine you were in a foreign country, and youcan tell you that students turn off after about 5 hours.
wanted to find a bathroom. You certainly wouldn'tOh, they'll sit there politely while the instructor barrels
enroll in a language course to meet this rather urgentahead, but the glassy-eyes and slow moments indicate
need! Yet this is exactly what many training sessionstheir lack of involvement (and I'm a dynamic teacher!).
accomplish for employees: nothing. And the urgentMy conclusion is that training sessions are better kept
business needs go unmet, or worse, get "looked up into shorter lengths overall, such as a maximum of 5-6
a hurry" and employees often resort to unorthodoxhours. Better still, allow at least 1-2 breaks in the
and poorly implemented solutions to avoid a crisis.morning and afternoon, or schedule training as half-day
This translates to hodge-podge solutions that oftensessions over several days. Nothing beats a fresh
need to be fixed over and over again, and evenstudent, a fresh teacher, and plenty of time--spread
redone from scratch the right way. Is this ringing trueout over time--for a successful training result.
for you or your organization?6. Lack of Follow-Up and Follow-Through
Therefore, always take the time and even extraAny successful learning involves feedback: knowing if
expense to ensure your training sessions areyou are on the right track, and if not, taking action to
customized to your employees and their job tasks.get back on track. Yet this key aspect of feedback,
Exercises should be similar to actual job requirements,which I am calling follow-up and follow-through, is rarely
and even use actual or sample company files in theif ever implemented.
classroom.In all of the 16 years I have been training, not once
Any training company will be willing to offer this forhave I been called back for a follow-up session to
you, but you must ask for it, and often pay extra forreinforce concepts, offer lab time, or simply entertain
such customization. But again, consider the alternativequestions students may have. Yet without follow-up
of wasting training dollars and suddenly this "luxury"and follow-through, your training sessions will be hit and
becomes a necessity.miss at best.
2. "Hands-OFF" Training SessionsWhat I am saying is, you need to communicate with
I have been called upon to deliver training sessions inyour employees and colleagues about recent training,
which I simply present the software to a group as adiscover if their needs have been met, and if not, find a
presentation, with little to no actual student involvement.way to meet their needs. Maybe it's just a matter of
I call this a "hands-off" training session, and in my mindpurchasing a reference book, or having the trainer
this is usually a waste of everyone's time and money.back for general questions, or to consult on a particular
Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computer, is quoted tojob-related issue.
have said (paraphrased), "People turn on their PCs toAn easy way to accomplish this is to use surveys for
turn on their minds; they turn on their TVs to turn offyour training sessions. One client I know uses a
their minds."company called SurveyMonkey to accomplish this; it
When you have a trainer demonstrating the softwaremakes it easy to create and send out surveys
for your employees, the employees naturally tend toelectronically. You can also use paper surveys that
turn off, like watching a movie or a TV show. It isyou design, but if you have a lot of training, the
much harder to concentrate when asked to simply sittabulating of the data can be quite work-intensive.
and watch a presentation, than when you areHowever you choose to do it, take the time to survey
expected to actually follow along and replicate whatstudents following the course to discover if they got
the instructor is doing.what they needed from the session, how well they felt
Therefore, from this point on, I would suggest neverthe instructor met their needs, and what could be done
holding training sessions that are simply demonstrations.to improve a future session.
Even if it costs more to rent a room and laptops forEven better than just a survey following the class is a
the employees, again you have to keep in mind whysurvey preceding the course, called a pre-survey. You
you are holding the training in the first place. If it iscan use pre/post surveys to really zero in on the
simply to placate management that all employeeseffectiveness of your training efforts, and ultimately
have been through a training session on a softwareimprove your dollars to sense ratio dramatically.
program, and accountability for employees toConclusion
understand and utilize the information is not necessary,In this article we have touched on some of the key
then by all means, hold these types of sessions.elements you need to consider when trying to
But if you require hard-hitting, powerful, effectivetranslate your training efforts into real-world results.
training for your employees, steer clear of this type ofWe discussed the power of :
training session. This, too, will greatly even out your
dollars and sense ratio.1. Customized training
3. Instructors are not "Entertraining"2. Hands-on training
We all like to be entertained. When we are bored, we3. Instructor "entertrainment"
turn off our brains; this is a fundamental law of being4. Labs during sessions
human. Of course you can scare people into paying5. Shorter training sessions, and
attention for a period of time, but other than that, you6. The importance of follow-up and follow-through with
need to engage their minds and entertain them whilepre- and post-course surveys
you train them. I call this "Entertraining."I hope you use the techniques to make your next
Of course, I'm not suggesting you hire an actualtraining session much more powerful than the last, and
comedian for your next training session (unless youhave your employees raving about the quality and
think it's funny), but you do want an instructor who noteffectiveness of your training sessions. Until next time,
only knows the material well, but who can also presentwe'll solve our problems Bit by Bit!
it in an entertaining and humorous way. The bottom line